|
E-Mail To Keith Ford Chief Executive Of Mayday Hospital From: Ian Perkin [ianperkin@blueyonder.co.uk]Sent: 07 November 2003 07:38 To: 'Keith.Ford@mayday.nhs.uk' Subject: RE: Patient Complaint
Dear
Mr Ford
It
is of course entirely up to you who you delegate your responsibilities too, in
respect of my mothers clinical care at your Trust. I however shall
continue to communicate with you, as you are the Chief Executive of the Trust
and I do not consider that the response from some of those who have the
responsibility for my mothers care at your hospital have
acted either adequately or appropriately and it is therefore not
unreasonable of me to bring this to your attention as Chief
Executive.
It
is now a week since I asked to meet and speak to a member of the medical staff
at your Trust to discuss my mothers condition and I still have not had
any response from anyone within your organisation to arrange such a meeting,
in fact I have not had any response to this request at all. Indeed Dr
Diggory yesterday left an answer phone message for my father to contact him,
despite the fact that I hold power of attorney for both of my parents because
of their respective medical problems and we have both made it clear to members
of your staff, that all matters related to my mothers care are to be addressed
to me.
Having
visited my mother at Purley Hospital at lunch time today to assist with
her feeding, I spoke to Sister Anderson Lawrence the ward sister on my
mothers ward. As a result of that meeting and a telephone call I
had later in the afternoon with Shelia Black the Care Manager, who Sister
Anderson Lawrence advised me to telephone, I have further complaints that
I wish to draw to your attention.
Firstly
when I asked yet again if I could talk to a member of the medical
staff I was told that the only doctor attending the patients had left for the
day.
Secondly
Sister Anderson Lawrence told me that my mother should have been
assessed at Mayday before she was transferred between hospitals as
Mayday have physiotherapy and occupational therapy facilities which Purley
Hospital do not. In her view if my mother had been properly assessed at
Mayday in may have been that therapy services properly applied may have
assisted my mother in being able to walk again.
Thirdly Sister
told me that my mother was being given a general anti-biotic
for yet another infection that she has apparently picked up, making
it three she has contracted while under the care of your Trust. She
asked me that I did not judge Purley Hospital on the standards applied at
Mayday, as they would work hard at Purley to care for my mother during
the twenty-eight days that she said would be at Purley? They would try
and care for my mother well. Sister also told me that I should
telephone Shelia Black the care manger.
I
rang Shelia Black and she told me that she had requested on the 24th October
that a Nursing Needs Assessment be carried out on my mother. She said
that looking at the file now it was clear that this had not been done, as
it should have been before my mother was transferred to Purley Hospital.
She said she could not explain why this had not been done and also told
me that according to the information she had been given, my mother's
only clinical problem was that she was suffering from a single broken
hip. When I told her that several weeks ago she had sustained
further injuries while in the care of the Mayday Trust and now had several new
fractures of the hip, she said that was not recorded on the file that she
had in her possession. What perhaps more alarmingly she said, was that
Purley Hospital was a holding bay for geriatric patients and that when the
pressure was on the Acute beds at Mayday, elderly patients were sometimes
hastily moved out before they had been properly assessed to ease the pressure
at the main hospital. This of course confirmed to me what I had always
suspected was behind the lack of consideration and care my mother had
received.
I
have no complaints about the conduct of either Sister Anderson Lawrence or
Shelia Black as they were both very helpful to me and I applaud their candour
in speaking so frankly about the real Mayday Trust and the problems it is
experiencing in dealing with geriatric patients.
My
additional complaints which should be added to those I have already made to
you are as follows:-
1).
I would like an explanation as to why my mother was not properly assessed
before she was moved to Purley Hospital as I have been advised
should have been the case.
2).
I would like to be told why my mother was not given access to the therapy
services,which Sister Anderson Lawrence tells me could have assisted my mother
to recover her ability to walk again had they been properly applied.
3).
I would like an explanation as to why Sheila Black's request for a
nursing assessment to be carried out on the 24th October at Mayday Hospital
was never carried out and why Sheila was not informed about the additional
fractures that my mother picked up while in the Trust's care.
4).
Why despite my request (now over a week old) that I speak to a member of the
senior medical team to discuss my mothers condition, I have still not
been given an appointment to see anyone who can explain what has
happened to my mother and what the long term prognosis is.
5). Why
despite the fact that both my father and myself have made it clear that I am
the person to represent our family in terms of all clinical decisions made
in respect of my mother's clinical care, Dr Diggory still
leaves messages for my father to telephone him.
Yours
sincerely
Ian
Perkin
|
|
|